Paving the road to GPC/SEC validation
By Daniela Held, PhD, PSS GmbH and Clara
Trimmer, PSS USA
Validation tools and tips for GPC/SEC systems are discussed here to
help users understand the validation process and decision-making issues
that yield cost-effective and faster validation. PSS offers services
and off-the-shelf products that fulfill the validation and
qualification directives that have for over 30 years, aimed to protect
citizens and environment from hazardous materials and to ensure product
safety.
The validation of analytical systems is not an easy task.
Validation is an ongoing complex process that evaluates the entire,
sample specific process, products, and analytical methods. Validation
consists of several qualification phases that verify pre-defined
performance specifications (design (DQ), installation (IQ), operation
(OQ), and performance (PQ)). Therefore, a one-time qualification event
for each component of the analytical system is not sufficient to
operate a valid system. System Validation is a frequent requirement:
after installation, prior to routine use, after maintenance or repair
and at regular time intervals.
Many lab managers associate validation with increased workloads and
paper work, because it requires extensive documentation of all testing
experiments. However, if the validation process is carefully and
thoroughly planned, with method know-how, it indeed decreases
documentation effort and ensures data integrity, traceability and
security. A validated system does not mean that there will never be a
problem with a product or an application. In many cases the validation
process helps identify potential problems early enough to provide
proactive solutions. Ultimately the validation responsibility lies on
the user.
GPC/SEC System
Validation
Validation of Analytical GPC/SEC systems is complete after the
instrument hardware, software, data, analytical method and operators
(Table 1) are factored in the process. In addition to performance tests
for each component of the system, it is essential to confirm that all
parts combined, work according to the performance specifications of the
analysis method.
The validation process for the components always requires the four
phases of qualification:
1. Design
Qualification
Often underestimated, this is the most important step in the validation
process. Users need to set and document their specific requirements, as
well as factor in the DQ evaluation, the extent of validation effort
supported by the vendors of the analytical equipment.
Consider the following questions/issues prior to the analytical
equipment selection:
- Is the analytical equipment robust and
can withstand GPC/SEC solvents? Some low cost instruments corrode
easily when exposed to GPC/SEC solvents, which are different from HPLC
solvents.
- The choice of a suitable column material
is crucial when validating the own application/method; the heart of a
GPC/SEC system is the column set. Robust GPC/SEC, with or without
specialty detectors, requires interaction free size exclusion
chromatography. The PSS Magic Triangle tool will assist you to choose
column materials that balance the polarity of sample, mobile and
stationary phases to achieve a robust GPC/SEC system.

- Choose columns of consistent quality with
matching particle size and porosity, avoid artifacts and to guarantee
the best resolution for your application.
- Does column vendor support the method
validation?
- Is it possible to reserve a
dedicated batch of column material for future use (over the next
years)? Occasionally, it is wise to reserve the production batch of a
column material, to guarantee long-term test quality of a given
application and to prevent the need of re-validation of the complete
application upon columns renewal.
- Which detectors are needed now and might
be useful in future? Can the validated system be easily expanded?
- How much (re-) validation effort is
needed to integrate future additional components into the system, in
order to increase versatility?
- Detectors?
- Full GPC/SEC systems?
- Software modules?
- Is the software validated and how it is
verified?
- Does it follow national and international
(ISO, DIN, ASTM) rules and guidelines?
- Is it compliant with the requirements of
21 CFR Part 11, which refer to all data acquisition and evaluation
software packages?
- Does the vendor support the user during
validation? How much of the validation process can and/or should be
outsourced?
- Does the evaluation software really track
all the relevant data and metadata associated with GPC/SEC?
2. Installation
Qualification (IQ)
The IQ should document that the system is received as designed and that
it is installed properly in the selected environment. It is important
to obtain documents that assert such conformity for the entire system
(hardware components and software). In addition, the conformity with
international GPC/SEC rules and guidelines should be documented
separately:
- ISO 13885,
- ISO 16014
- ASTM D 5296-05
- DIN 55672
Of critical importance is the recording of conditions, raw data and
metadata, which influence the evaluation and results. See Table 2. The
modular software, WinGPC Unity, automatically tracks all metadata
information in a sample audit trail and manages the samples through a
comprehensive database. Not every GPC software maker can second this
claim.
| Table 2 Data
& meta data for GPC/SEC and coupling techniques |
| GPC/SEC |
GPC/SEC
Viscometry |
GPC/SEC
Triple (plus) |
GPC/SEC
Light
Scattering |
|
General Data: Document
with IQ and/or PQ
Components manufacturer(s), type and model number, serial numbers,
firmware version
Acquisition and evaluation software, version
PC configuration and operating system
Column material, column manufacturer, serial numbers, and actual column
parameters (plate count, asymmetry, resolution)
|
| GPC/SEC |
GPC/SEC
Viscometry |
GPC/SEC
Triple (plus) |
GPC/SEC
Light
Scattering |
meta
data: Document with sample in audit trail
Solvent, flow rate, temperature, sample concentration (approx.),
injection volume (approx.)
Baseline and integration limits left and right
Baseline type, internal standard/flow correction used, internal
standard calibration, internal standard measurement |
| GPC/SEC |
GPC/SEC
Viscometry |
|
meta
data: Document with sample in audit trail
Calibration method, calibration standards calibration fit used,
calibration coefficients |
|
|
GPC/SEC
Viscometry |
GPC/SEC
Triple (plus) |
GPC/SEC
Light
Scattering |
|
meta
data: Document with sample in audit trail
Precise sample concentration, precise injection volume, method to
determine slice concentration and related parameters |
|
|
GPC/SEC
Triple (plus) |
GPC/SEC
Light
Scattering |
|
|
meta data: Document with sample in audit
trail
Sample refractive index increment, solvent refractive index, scattering
angle(s), method (LALLS, MALLS, RALLS), instrument constant LS
detector/Rayleigh ratio measured for toluene, laser wavelength, fit
function for molar mass over elution volume for MALLS: normalization
coefficients, plot type (Zimm, Debye, Berry..), fit function for plot
type |
|
GPC/SEC
Viscometry |
GPC/SEC
Triple
|
|
|
meta
data: Document with sample in audit trail
Instrument constant viscometer/DPT sensitivity, fit function for
intrinsic viscosity over elution volume |
|
3. Operational
Qualification (OQ)
The OQ step relies on GPC/SEC know-how, to verify that the entire
system will function according to the operational specifications.
The following steps may result on considerable time and effort savings:
a) Perform a system suitability test. Check the integral GPC/SEC system
for its ability to measure GPC/SEC results (Mn, Mw, Mp and molecular
weight distribution). PSS
EasyValid
Validation
Kit has everything you need to complete this verification.
The EasyValid Validation procedure is straightforward and works for all
GPC/SEC brands, provided their system evaluation software supports
independent baseline & integration limits as well as polynomial 5th
order functions for calibration curve fitting. Round robin Certified
Reference Polymers are tested according to the prescribed SOP. A
validation
report is created with WinGPC Unity MCDS. The report and
pass/fail flags are automatically generated.
b) Check additional molar mass sensitive detectors for their ability to
measure the appropriate primary information such as (light scattering)
Mw or (viscometer) intrinsic viscosity. PSS manufactures dedicated
validation kits for the testing of light scattering detectors:
viscometers, Triple, and Triple plus detection systems, once the
functionality of the overall system, GPC/SEC is corroborated.
c) Validate your separation column/column set (plate count, asymmetry
and resolution), to ensure conformity with international guidelines.
PSS Columns come with a
sufficient documentation to facilitate this step.
d) Validate your own application method for precision, robustness and
reproducibility; run a checkout (quality assurance) sample that allows
a quick and traceable system check prior to each analysis. The sample
may come from commercial standards or from your stock.
4.
Performance Qualification PQ
PQ demonstrates that the
instrument performs consistently, on a day-to-day basis, according to
the specifications under given analysis conditions for the application.
The validation responsibility for this qualification step is solely the
users. However, vendors ease the burden by offering preventive
maintenance checklists, qualified maintenance and periodic training.
Software SOPs and change control documents also reduce the user's
workload.
Routine use of adequate software tools also eases the workload. PSS
supports software users with added functionality such as the automatic
generation of quality charts from the overlay mode. The WinGPC Unity
Report Designer empowers the user to perform this function with just
one mouse click, freeing precious time resources for other tasks.
Finally, the WinGPC Unity with Compliance Pack addresses all the
record-keeping desired for valid GPC/SEC systems, tracking metadata
information in a sample audit trail and managing the samples through a
comprehensive database. It does work! Call PSS (1888-477-7872) to talk
about your validation needs, or visit http://pssgpcshop.com
References
United States Food & Drug Administration, Code of Federal
Regulations, Title 21, Food and Drugs, Part 11; Electronic records,
Electronic Signatures; Final Rule; Federal Register 62 (54),
13430/13466, 1997
United States Food & Drug Administration, Guidance for Industry
Part 11; Electronic Records, Electronic Signatures - Scope and
Application, 2003
Ludwig Huber, A primer: Good laboratory practice and current good
manufacturing practice, Agilent Technologies, publication number
5968-6193E
R. D. McDowall, Quo Vadis 21 CFR 11, LC-GC Europe, February edition,
2-7, 2004SS